This post is based on an email that was sent and in no way reflects the views and opinions of ''Met'' or Jamaicangroupiemet.com. To send in a story send your email to [email protected]

WHY DID JESUS SUFFER AND DIE- GOODMORNING

Why Did Jesus Have To Suffer And Die?

Is God a “bloody God”?

Two primary qualities of God help us understand why Jesus Christ had to suffer and die in order to redeem mankind. First, God is righteous. Thus His justice demands that a penalty for sin be paid. As Kenyon writes:

God cannot ignore the fact of man’s hideous transgression. That transgression must be punished, and if man is restored to God, it must be upon grounds that will not pauperize man nor rob him of his self respect; but it must be upon legal grounds that will perfectly justify man in the sight of God… [1]

Second, God is love. Thus, in His grace and mercy, He decreed that the penalty for sin could be paid by a substitute, providing that the substitute be sinless. God wanted, and mankind needed, a man who:

…met the demands, first, of the heart of Deity for a perfect human who would do His will; second, He met the demands of fallen man in that as a man He met the Devil and conquered him in honorable open combat. [2]

Because of the magnitude of Adam’s sin and its reverberating ramifications, only the death penalty would satisfy true justice. Hebrews 9:22 says that “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness [of sin].” In the Old Testament, it was the death of unblemished “stand-in” lambs and other animals that God allowed to temporarily cover His people’s sins (Heb. 10:1-14). These sacrifices were foreshadows, or types, of the coming Redeemer, Jesus Christ. He is the true “Lamb of God” whose blood was shed to take away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Hebrews 9:14
How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!

As we have stated, Jesus Christ was the only man who was “without spot or blemish,” both genetically and behaviorally. As such, only he could qualify to offer his life as the payment for the sin and sins of mankind. The suffering and death of Jesus Christ was part of God’s plan to make available salvation to all mankind.

Hebrews 9:27 and 28
(27) Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,
(28) So Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.

What the blood of bulls and goats could do only temporarily for Israel in the Old Testament, the blood of Jesus has done once and for all for everyone who believes in him. He bore our sins in his own body on the cross (1 Pet. 2:24). By his freedom of will he gave up his life for us. He willingly endured the pain of the cross and death for all men. We must understand, however, that it was not God who was responsible for Jesus’ death. Note the following verses:

1 Corinthians 2:7 and 8
(7) No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
(8) None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.

The “rulers of this age” are Satan and his evil-spirit sidekicks (the disobedient angels that were cast down to earth with him). God’s Word plainly says that it is the Devil who was responsible for killing Jesus Christ.

Once the dominion of the world was given to Satan, and mankind was ruined by sin, God has had to ask people to step into harm’s way so that His redemptive purposes could be accomplished. Jesus Christ is the chief example of this, and there are many others (see Hebrews 11). Jesus suffered so that those who believe on him can one day have peace and joy forever, and a taste of it even in this life. In Jesus, we see the epitome of the redemptive value of suffering, a subject we will discuss later.

Hebrews 5:7-9 (Moffatt)
In the days of his flesh, with bitter cries and tears, he offered prayers and supplications to Him who was able to save him from death; and he was heard, because of his godly fear. Thus, Son though he was, he learned by all he suffered how to obey, and by being THUS PERFECTED he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him, being designated by God high priest with the rank of Melchizedek.

We feel the Moffatt translation (e.g.,“thus perfected”) best represents the truth of the Greek text that Jesus attained moral perfection through suffering and death. It was God who totally “perfected” Jesus by raising Him from the dead with a glorious new body and exalting Him as Lord, as the following verses make clear:

Hebrews 2:9-11
(9) But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.
(10) In bringing many sons to glory, it was fitting that God, for whom and through whom everything exists, should make the author of their salvation perfect through suffering.
(11) Both the one who makes men holy and those who are made holy are of the same family. So Jesus is not ashamed to call them brothers.

Jesus Christ is the Last Adam, the fulfillment of God’s prophecy in Genesis 3:15. As our Redeemer, Jesus purchased our salvation with his own blood. He provided, and is, the way back to God that Adam had lost. Those who confess him as Lord and believe in his resurrection are saved, fully equipped to live in this corrupted world and guaranteed ultimate and everlasting victory over sin and death, as we shall see.

UNCALLED FOR

MEEEEEEEEEEEET SHAWNA STAR GET PUT OUT A LEFRACK VIEWING IT WAS A PRIVATE VIEWING THE MADDA AND THE BABY MADDA NEVA A GUH IN A DI CHURCH TILL SHE COME OUT MI SEH THE WHOLE A NASSAU COUNTY POLICE COME TEK HAR OUT A DI WAKE U WOULDA THINK A BIN LADEN GYAL SHAME LIKE DAAAAAAWG

MUNCHIE MI FEEL IT

EVERY WORD IS TRUE LMAOO

WHY MAYBE ITS THE MEXICANS PART 2

Case Information
Case Type: Criminal Location:  Downtown
Party Information
Party Name – Number Relationship Sex Attorney Judge Case #
State Of Arizona – (1) Plaintiff N/A Huddleston, Natalie
Jose Valenzuela-Meza – (2) Defendant M Margolis, Roger Master Calendar CR2011-141146-001
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza – (3) Defendant M Stirling, Robert Master Calendar CR2011-141146-002
Oneick Anando Brown – (4) Defendant M Harmon, Melody Master Calendar CR2011-141146-003
Jamie Bussereth – (5) Defendant M DERRICK, CLARK Master Calendar CR2011-141146-004
Clerk Of The Court – (6) In The Matter Of N/A To Be Determined
Disposition Information
Party Name ARSCode Description Crime Date Disposition Code Disposition Date
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-3408 (F2) NARCOTIC DRUG VIOLATION 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 8/17/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/23/2012
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-2312B (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/23/2012
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 12/12/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/30/2012
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/30/2012
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/30/2012
Oneick Anando Brown 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-2317 (F3) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-1003 (F2) CONSPIRACY 8/9/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-2312 (F3) ILLEGAL CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE 8/9/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-2317 (F4) MONEY LAUNDERING 8/9/2011 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 4/6/2012
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 12/12/2011
Jose Valenzuela-Meza 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/23/2012
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 12/12/2011
Miguel Valenzuela-Meza 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011 Dismissed – Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 1/30/2012
Oneick Anando Brown 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011
Oneick Anando Brown 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011
Jamie Bussereth 13-3405A2 (F3) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 4/6/2012
Jamie Bussereth 13-3405A2 (F2) MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE 8/9/2011
Case Documents
Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
6/8/2012 169 – ME: Sent/Dispo Reset – Party (004) 6/8/2012
5/18/2012 105 – ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea – Party (003) 5/18/2012
5/15/2012 PAG – Plea Agreement – Party (003) 5/25/2012
5/8/2012 023 – ME: Order Entered By Court – Party (002) 5/8/2012
5/6/2012 SDO – Order to Seal Documents – Party (004) 5/30/2012
4/13/2012 598 – ME: Continuance Past last Day – Party (003) 4/13/2012
4/11/2012 085 – ME: Conference – Party (003) 4/11/2012
4/10/2012 105 – ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea – Party (004) 4/10/2012
4/6/2012 PAG – Plea Agreement – Party (004) 4/19/2012
2/7/2012 DRE – Disposition Report – Party (002) 2/8/2012
2/2/2012 109 – ME: Sentence – Probation – Party (002) 2/2/2012
2/2/2012 TOP – Terms and Conditions Of Probation – Party (001) 2/3/2012
NOTE: AMENDED
1/30/2012 TCP – Terms & Conditions Of Probation/Money Ordered – Party (002) 2/3/2012
1/30/2012 NRR – Notice Of Rights Of Review – Party (002) 2/6/2012
1/30/2012 PSR – Presentence Report – Party (002) 2/9/2012
1/27/2012 RTR – Return Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits – Party (004) 1/27/2012
1/26/2012 SME – Sentencing Memo – Party (002) 1/26/2012
NOTE: Defendants Sentencing Memorandum
1/25/2012 109 – ME: Sentence – Probation – Party (001) 1/25/2012
1/23/2012 TCP – Terms & Conditions Of Probation/Money Ordered – Party (001) 2/3/2012
1/23/2012 PAG – Plea Agreement – Party (001) 2/6/2012
1/23/2012 NRR – Notice Of Rights Of Review – Party (001) 2/6/2012
1/23/2012 PSR – Presentence Report – Party (001) 2/9/2012
1/19/2012 ORD – Order – Party (004) 1/23/2012
NOTE: AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT TO SURRENDER INTO THE TEMPORARY CUSTODY OF THE ATTORNEY SEEKING CUSTODY OF THE GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS THE SAME TO BE RETURNED ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM ON 1-30-12
1/19/2012 598 – ME: Continuance Past last Day – Party (003) 1/19/2012
1/19/2012 598 – ME: Continuance Past last Day – Party (004) 1/19/2012
1/19/2012 RRF – Release Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits – Party (004) 1/26/2012
1/19/2012 MTR – Motion for Temporary Removal Of Court File/Transcripts/Exhibit – Party (004) 1/26/2012
1/18/2012 169 – ME: Sent/Dispo Reset – Party (002) 1/18/2012
1/13/2012 MEM – Memorandum – Party (004) 1/13/2012
NOTE: Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Approve Substitution of Counsel and for Trial Continuance Filed on January 11, 2012
1/11/2012 MOT – Motion – Party (004) 1/12/2012
NOTE: Motion to Appove Substitution of Counsel and for Trial Continuance
12/15/2011 598 – ME: Continuance Past last Day – Party (003) 12/15/2011
12/15/2011 105 – ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea – Party (002) 12/15/2011
12/15/2011 105 – ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea – Party (001) 12/15/2011
12/15/2011 598 – ME: Continuance Past last Day – Party (004) 12/15/2011
12/13/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (004) 12/13/2011
12/13/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (002) 12/13/2011
12/13/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (003) 12/13/2011
12/13/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (001) 12/13/2011
12/12/2011 PAG – Plea Agreement – Party (001) 12/23/2011
12/12/2011 PAG – Plea Agreement – Party (002) 12/23/2011
12/11/2011 MCO – Motion To Continue – Party (003) 12/12/2011
NOTE: STIPULATED / TRIAL SETTING ON 12/20/11
12/9/2011 MCO – Motion To Continue – Party (004) 12/9/2011
NOTE: TRIAL
11/22/2011 RTR – Return Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits – Party (003) 12/5/2011
11/18/2011 MTR – Motion for Temporary Removal Of Court File/Transcripts/Exhibit – Party (003) 12/2/2011
11/18/2011 OFT – Order for Temporary Removal of Court File/Transcripts/Exhibits – Party (003) 12/2/2011
11/18/2011 RRF – Release Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits – Party (003) 12/2/2011
11/16/2011 027 – ME: Pretrial Conference – Party (004) 11/16/2011
11/16/2011 027 – ME: Pretrial Conference – Party (003) 11/16/2011
11/16/2011 027 – ME: Pretrial Conference – Party (002) 11/16/2011
11/16/2011 027 – ME: Pretrial Conference – Party (001) 11/16/2011
11/10/2011 STA – Statement – Party (004) 11/16/2011
NOTE: COMPREHENSIVE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE/
11/10/2011 STA – Statement – Party (001) 11/16/2011
NOTE: COMPREHENSIVE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE/
11/10/2011 STA – Statement – Party (002) 11/16/2011
NOTE: COMPREHENSIVE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE/
11/10/2011 STA – Statement – Party (003) 11/16/2011
NOTE: COMPREHENSIVE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE/
11/8/2011 NOT – Notice – Party (002) 11/8/2011
NOTE: OF DEFENSES AND LIST OF WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS
10/28/2011 098 – ME: Substitution Of Counsel – Party (002) 10/28/2011
10/26/2011 AFF – Affidavit – Party (003) 10/27/2011
10/25/2011 MOT – Motion – Party (002) 10/27/2011
NOTE: FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
10/17/2011 194 : Me: Initial Pretrial Conference – Party (003) 10/17/2011
10/17/2011 194 : Me: Initial Pretrial Conference – Party (004) 10/17/2011
10/17/2011 194 : Me: Initial Pretrial Conference – Party (002) 10/17/2011
10/17/2011 194 : Me: Initial Pretrial Conference – Party (001) 10/17/2011
10/13/2011 BON – Bond – Party (003) 10/13/2011
NOTE: PAPER/SURETY $1,600 BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY
10/11/2011 STA – Statement – Party (004) 10/11/2011
NOTE: Defendants Rule 15.2 Disclosure Statement
10/10/2011 NOT – Notice – Party (002) 10/11/2011
NOTE: Rule 15.2 Disclosure
10/7/2011 005 – ME: Hearing – Party (003) 10/7/2011
10/4/2011 ROS – Release Order Supervised Release – Party (003) 10/6/2011
9/29/2011 RES – Response – Party (003) 9/30/2011
NOTE: States Response To Defendants Motion To Modify Relase
9/27/2011 094 – ME: Oral Argument Set – Party (003) 9/27/2011
9/20/2011 MOT – Motion – Party (003) 9/20/2011
NOTE: Motion to Modify Release Conditions
9/19/2011 NDR – Notice of Defenses and Request for Notice of Rebuttal Witnesses – Party (003) 9/19/2011
NOTE: nod
9/19/2011 NAR – Notice Of Appearance – Party (004) 9/19/2011
NOTE: OF COUNSEL AND DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY
9/13/2011 RON – Release Order No Bond – Party (001) 9/13/2011
9/12/2011 ROB – Release Order Secured Appearance Bond – Party (003) 9/13/2011
NOTE: $60,000
9/12/2011 RON – Release Order No Bond – Party (002) 9/13/2011
9/8/2011 DAR – Notice of Disclosure and Request for Disclosure – Party (002) 9/8/2011
NOTE: STATES NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
9/8/2011 DAR – Notice of Disclosure and Request for Disclosure – Party (001) 9/8/2011
NOTE: STATES NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
9/8/2011 DAR – Notice of Disclosure and Request for Disclosure – Party (003) 9/8/2011
NOTE: STATES NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
9/8/2011 DAR – Notice of Disclosure and Request for Disclosure – Party (004) 9/8/2011
NOTE: STATES NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
9/7/2011 RTM – Returned Mail – Party (004) 9/7/2011
8/29/2011 152 – ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign – Party (003) 8/29/2011
8/29/2011 152 – ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign – Party (004) 8/29/2011
8/29/2011 152 – ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign – Party (002) 8/29/2011
8/29/2011 152 – ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign – Party (001) 8/29/2011
8/25/2011 UPI – Updated Information Address and/or Name – Party (004) 8/30/2011 Defendant (5)
8/25/2011 ROS – Release Order Supervised Release – Party (004) 8/29/2011
8/25/2011 023 – ME: Order Entered By Court – Party (002) 8/25/2011
8/24/2011 BON – Bond – Party (004) 8/25/2011
NOTE: PAPER/SURETY $50,000 SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORP
8/24/2011 NOT – Notice – Party (002) 8/25/2011
NOTE: OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFER FROM LEGAL ADVOCATE TO OPDS
8/24/2011 ORD – Order – Party (002) 8/25/2011
NOTE: THAT THIS CASE IS TRANSFERRED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE LEGAL ADVOCATE TO THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES
8/23/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (002) 8/23/2011
8/23/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (004) 8/23/2011
8/23/2011 002 – ME: Hearing Vacated – Party (001) 8/23/2011
8/22/2011 IAD – Initial Appearance Document – Party (004) 8/22/2011
8/22/2011 IAD – Initial Appearance Document – Party (003) 8/22/2011
8/22/2011 IAD – Initial Appearance Document – Party (001) 8/22/2011
8/22/2011 IAD – Initial Appearance Document – Party (002) 8/22/2011
8/22/2011 NAR – Notice Of Appearance – Party (004) 8/22/2011
8/16/2011 NSI – Notice of Supervening Indictment – Party (002) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 606 – ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment – Party (002) 8/17/2011
8/16/2011 IND – Indictment – Party (002) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 NSI – Notice of Supervening Indictment – Party (003) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 606 – ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment – Party (003) 8/17/2011
8/16/2011 IND – Indictment – Party (003) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 NSI – Notice of Supervening Indictment – Party (004) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 606 – ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment – Party (004) 8/17/2011
8/16/2011 IND – Indictment – Party (004) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 NSI – Notice of Supervening Indictment – Party (001) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/16/2011 606 – ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment – Party (001) 8/17/2011
8/16/2011 IND – Indictment – Party (001) 8/17/2011 Plaintiff (1)
8/11/2011 DCO – Direct Complaint – Party (001) 8/11/2011
8/11/2011 DCO – Direct Complaint – Party (002) 8/11/2011
8/11/2011 DCO – Direct Complaint – Party (003) 8/11/2011
8/11/2011 DCO – Direct Complaint – Party (004) 8/11/2011
Case Calendar
Date Time Event
8/17/2011 8:30 Status Conference
8/17/2011 8:30 Status Conference
8/17/2011 8:30 Status Conference
8/17/2011 8:30 Status Conference
8/22/2011 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
8/22/2011 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
8/22/2011 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
8/22/2011 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
8/25/2011 8:30 Original Arraignment Hearing
8/25/2011 8:30 Original Arraignment Hearing
8/25/2011 8:30 Original Arraignment Hearing
8/25/2011 8:30 Original Arraignment Hearing
10/4/2011 8:15 Oral Argument
10/11/2011 8:15 Initial Pretrial Conference
10/11/2011 8:15 Initial Pretrial Conference
10/11/2011 8:15 Initial Pretrial Conference
10/11/2011 8:15 Initial Pretrial Conference
11/8/2011 8:15 Comprehensive PreTrial Conference
11/8/2011 8:15 Comprehensive PreTrial Conference
11/8/2011 8:15 Comprehensive PreTrial Conference
11/8/2011 8:15 Comprehensive PreTrial Conference

KELLY DI PEOPLE DEM A ASK IF YUH FINALLY LEF OWN

Shanakay Reid
If you eat, sleep, shit, and bathe with the phone why wouldn’t I think you cheating??!

 

NAH SEH NOTHING PRE THE NAMES (WHY MEXICAN NAME A CALL) …PART 1

JULY 11, 2012GREENBELT, MD
9 charged in alleged $950,000 marijuana distribution and money laundering conspiracy
GREENBELT, Md. — A federal grand jury has indicted nine individuals charged with conspiring to distribute more than 2,200 pounds of marijuana and with conspiring to conduct financial transactions to conceal the source and ownership of the proceeds of the drug distribution, following an investigation led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) along with the Prince George’s County Police Department.
“Earlier today, Homeland Security Investigations special agents executed seven arrest warrants in Maryland and two in Arizona resulting in the dismantling of a suspected drug trafficking and money laundering organization,” said William Winter, HSI special agent in charge in Baltimore. “This is an excellent example of how teamwork between HSI and the Prince George’s County Police Department benefits our communities. HSI works aggressively to keep illegal drugs out of our communities, and to dismantle the criminal networks that profit from drug trafficking and the crime that surrounds it.”
The two-count indictment filed in the District of Maryland was returned July 9 and unsealed Wednesday upon the HSI arrests of the following defendants:
Jose Valenzuela, 58, of Nogales, Ariz.;
Beatriz Valenzuela, 55, of Nogales;
Antonio Hill Jr., aka NuNu, 32, of Largo, Md.;
Erico Hill, aka Rico, 31, of Hyattsville, Md.;
James Lewis Jr., aka Little Man, 22, of Hyattsville;
Kenneth Davis, aka Benny, 24, of Hyattsville;
Ernest Rawlings Jr., aka Junior, 29, of Riverdale, Md.;
Errol Comma, aka E, age 30, of Lanham, Md.; and
Jane Nkemateh, aka Jayne Nekematah, 28, of New Carrollton, Md.
The indictment seeks the forfeiture of $950,000, believed to be the value of the cash and property involved in the conspiracies. The defendants each face a maximum sentence of life in prison for the drug conspiracy and 20 years in prison for the money laundering conspiracy. An initial appearance has been scheduled for the Valenzuelas June 11 in U.S. District Court in Tucson, Ariz. The remaining defendants will have an initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt this afternoon.
“I am proud of the efforts put forth by the Prince George’s County Police Department’s Narcotics Enforcement Division investigators. Their work at combating this elaborate criminal scheme will prevent untold amounts of illegal drugs from spreading across communities in our county,” said Prince George’s County Police Chief Mark A. Magaw.
The indictment alleges that from at least June 6, 2011 to the present, the defendants conspired to transport marijuana from Arizona to Maryland. The indictment further alleges that Jose Valenzuela and his wife, Beatriz Valenzuela, shipped marijuana from Arizona to Maryland and received proceeds in return, while Antonio Hill Jr., coordinated the shipment of drugs from Arizona to Maryland and managed the laundering of the proceeds to the sources of supply in Arizona, with the assistance of his brother, Erico Hill, who, according to the indictment, also coordinated the distribution of the marijuana in Maryland. The indictment further alleges that James Lewis Jr., Ernest Rawlings Jr., Errol Comma and Jane Nkemateh all assisted in the receipt of packages containing marijuana from Arizona; and that Lewis and Kenneth Davis further assisted in the repackaging of marijuana for distribution in Maryland, and the laundering of the proceeds to the sources of supply in Arizona.
According to the indictment, it was part of the conspiracy that the co-conspirators structured financial transactions, keeping the transactions to less than $10,000 to evade IRS filing requirements for transactions involving more than $10,000 in cash, and conceal from the government large cash transactions by narcotics dealers. The indictment further alleges that the co-conspirators used third parties to open bank accounts at multiple financial institutions to promote the distribution of marijuana and conceal funds that were derived from drug proceeds.
An indictment is not a finding of guilt. An individual charged by indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty at some later criminal proceedings.
The investigation was conducted by HSI Baltimore, HSI Phoenix and the Prince George’s County Police Department and is an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force case.
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mara Zusman Greenberg and Christen A. Sproule.
You may also visit us on Facebook, Twitter

DISCLAIMER The views or opinions appearing on this blog are solely those of their respective authors. In no way do such posts represent the views, opinions or beliefs of “Met,” or jamaicangroupiemet.com. “Met” and jamaicangroupiemet.com will not assume liability for the opinions or statements, nor the accuracy of such statements, posted by users utilizing this blog to express themselves. Users are advised that false statements which are defamatory in nature may be subject to legal action, for which the user posting such statements will be personally liable for any damages or other liability, of any nature, arising out of the posting of such statements. Comments submitted to this blog may be edited to meet our format and space requirements. We also reserve the right to edit vulgar language and/or comments involving topics we may deem inappropriate for this web site.

****RULES**** 1. Debates and rebuttals are allowed but disrespectful curse-outs will prompt immediate BAN 2. Children are never to be discussed in a negative way 3. Personal information  eg. workplace, status, home address are never to be posted in comments. 4. All are welcome but please exercise discretion when posting your comments , do not say anything about someone you wouldnt like to be said about  you. 5. Do not deliberately LIE on someone here or send in any information based on your own personal vendetta. 6. If your picture was taken from a prio site eg. fimiyaad etc and posted on JMG, you cannot request its removal. 7. If you dont like this forum, please do not whine and wear us out, do yourself the favor of closing the screen- Thanks! . To send in a story send your email to :- [email protected]