A GWERU man recently went berserk and severely assaulted his landlord after he allegedly caught him red-handed, pants down, having sex with his wife.

The enraged man landed himself in more problems when the assaulted landlord allegedly retaliated by evicting him from his house.

The man reportedly lost his wife in the process to the landlord.

The incident, which reads more like a movie script, occurred last week at a house along Serima Road in Mambo suburb in Gweru.

The man narrated his ordeal to Chronicle, highlighting how his landlord snatched his wife and evicted him from his house.

He said he intended to sue the landlord for snatching his wife.

“It’s a very painful experience to say the least because I did not expect my wife to betray me to that extent. She has been cheating on me, having an extra-marital affair with my landlord. As if that was not enough, when I was evicted for assaulting the landlord after catching him pants down with my wife, she refused to move out with me and remained at the landlord’s house,” he said.

He said by staying put at the house, his wife had apparently chosen the landlord over him.

The man who, however, indicated that he was no longer interested in re-uniting with his wife of two years, also accused the landlord of unlawfully evicting him.

“I suspect that my landlord and my wife had planned all this. After catching them red-handed in my bedroom, he decided to evict me without giving me any notice. To my surprise, my wife refused to leave and until now she is occupying the same room that we used to have as our lodgings. I am, however, still seeking legal advice on how to tackle this situation,” he said.

The wife declined to comment when she was contacted for comment.

The landlord confirmed that he evicted the tenant for “unbecoming behaviour” and dismissed his former tenant’s claims that he was in an illicit affair with the wife.

“I confirm that I evicted the man for his unbecoming behaviour. He is the best person to tell you the reasons for his eviction but to say that I snatched his wife is totally untrue,” he said.

The landlord said the man’s wife was still occupying the rented room she used to occupy with her estranged husband as she was now serving a notice.

“I could not continue accommodating him because of his violent behaviour and his wife is only serving notice. I am still expecting my rentals from the wife until their three months notice period lapses,” said the landlord.

Why is there basically no mention of the Devil in the Old Testament?

That is an excellent question, and we do our best to answer it in our book, Don’t Blame God: A Biblical Answer to the Problem of Evil, Sin, and Suffering. The handful of references to Satan in the Old Testament (see Gen. 3:1, Job 1:6-13; 2:1-7; Isa. 14:12-20, and Ezek. 28:1-19) did not fully reveal the being who Jesus revealed in the New Testament. Looking back in light of the New Testament, we understand these verses as referring to him, but they were sufficiently cryptic so as to conceal much information about him. They recognized the existence of a spirit realm, and good and evil spirits, but had no idea of the two spiritual kingdoms at war with one another.

The basic reason why God did not reveal the Devil to people in Old Testament times is that they were unprepared to deal with such a powerful spiritual being. They were not spiritually equipped to combat an invisible enemy with incredible supernatural ability who was committed to their destruction. Given that the vast majority of them had no spiritual weapons, the loving thing for God to do was to hide the Devil’s existence from them. To His credit, through the Old Testament God just “took the rap,” as it were, for evil by saying that if His people obeyed, He would bless them, and if they did not obey, He would afflict them. The latter is language that is explained in our book, Don’t Blame God! It is absolutely critical that Christians understand the Old Testament in light of the New Testament. God is love, and He will not do harm to His people.

Prior to the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1and following), only a few select people had the gift of holy spirit. One of the purposes of Jesus’ coming was to destroy the Devil’s work (1 John 3:8). On the Day of Pentecost Jesus poured out the gift of holy spirit, which inherently gives us spiritual power (Luke 10:19; John 7:39; Acts 1:8; etc.). Unlike the Old Testament, God has now revealed that “our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Eph. 6:12). And further, unlike the Old Testament believers, we now have both spiritual power and authority to stand against the schemes of the Devil (Eph. 6:10 and 11).

“The killings appear to be linked to the earlier slaying of Keith Taylor, who, along with Bussereth, was involved in the drug rip-off, law-enforcement sources told The Post.
Taylor, 39, was killed on June 22 in Queens.”

LEFRAC APPEARED TO BE IN FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
 

900G heist in triple slay
By LARRY CELONA & DAN MANGAN
Last Updated: 2:46 AM, July 11, 2012
Posted: 2:46 AM, July 11, 2012

Share on emailShare on facebookMore Sharing ServicesMore Print
One of the men killed in a triple slaying in Queens over the weekend had apparently been taunting a drug dealer — throwing around some of the $900,000 he stole from the thug, sources said yesterday.
James Bussereth, 33, had boasted of a $20,000 bounty on his head after the theft — and apparently didn’t care who saw him flaunting his new wealth.
Friday night, Bussereth and three pals were ambushed by at least two thugs armed with AK-47-like assault rifles.
Bussereth and two pals died. The other man survived.

I THINK DEM A SCROLL JMG FI TRUTH…WID DI PART WHEY DEM SEH IS AT LEAST TWO MEN
In a photograph emailed in to JMG, were the bodies of what appeared to be two men who were involved in the gruesome shooting on Saturday , July7, 2012. Both men visibly have multiple gunshot wounds , one of the men who appeared to have been wearing a white t-shirt has a defense gunshot wound on his arm , where he seems to have been trying to block the shot. The bullet seemingly tore through his arm and his bone could be seen. Another gunshot wound could also be seen further up his arm, closer to his shoulder. His forehead appeared to have been almost torn off by the bullets and his face showed traumatic and haunting wounds. The head of this young man was slumped over the back of the seat but hung down resting on the driver of the vehicle. Most of his wounds appears to be in his head and chest area.
The driver, who seems to have been wearing a navy blue or black t-shirt, appears to have been shot first as his window was riddled with bullets and the steering wheel splattered with blood as if he was shot first to stop the vehicle from moving. He appears to have taken more shots than the young man in white.While he has also has a defense wound on his arm, blood, cartilage and brain matter appears to have covered his arm. He was slumped over in his seat, with visible wounds on the side of his face and blood from those wounds, poured onto his arms and onto the shirt of the young man who was beside him.
From the photograph , it could be assumed that the vehicle was ambushed. First from the front , where the driver was shot in the head and then from the driver’s side of the vehicle. The shooter appeared to have been on both sides of the vehicle because both men have defense wounds on the outside of their arms. It can also be assumed that they were attacked by at least two men based on the nature of their injuries.