Monthly Archives: May 2011

This post is based on an email that was sent and in no way reflects the views and opinions of ''Met'' or Jamaicangroupiemet.com. To send in a story send your email to [email protected]

OLIVER MEMORY 1

Oliver come from country and went to see a popular producer because he wants to become a singer, so he is dressed with his beret hat skeel to the side, his (norman manley) bush jacket, his scarf around his neck and the play begins with him talking to the producer, ringing his hands as if he is shy, like children do…. “Mr. producer sar, mi come from country caw mi can sing and de ppl dem up a country sey mi fi come a town come buss, fah mi voice nice, han dem sey mi muss buss fass” de producer sey ” awrite mi hear what yuh saying but mi haffi hear yuh sing, so sing sumting”,   hear Oliver in a one stush voice  a sing …. “hi know a gurlllll,  her name is Lola, she is so sweet she sweet like sugar”… De producer stop him an say, ok mi hear yuh and yuh can really sing but dem style deh nah go mek it a kingston, no not at all, ah dance hall dweet ah town, mi ago go wrk wid yuh image and style and dem yuh wi see caw yuh hv real potential,……… de next time we see Oliver him in a de studio round de mike, Oliver have on him dawkas, rasta belt tie round him head, him peak hat tun back ways , gone was de scarf and de bush jacket, and hear him ..”Level vibes!!”  de music start beat an Oliver start talk and sey….”Now dis one dedicated to on big foot gal name Lola!!” “go inna it” (to de engineer) de rhythm start pump hear Oliver start dj…..”Lola gal sey yuh a ediat,yat, mi nah married to nuh big rat bat,at,  yuh face fava dem black ducth pot, an yuh foot dem fava kencott!!!! lawwd ah wadda die ah wadda da da die die,…… Met one of de funniest oliver mi ever see!!  lolol

WIDER PIPE NEEDED- APPLY WITHIN


HI BRIDGEZ :)

HI I NEED HELP TO CROSS THE BAYOU

GOODMORNING- DAVID

David’s Exchange with Eliab
(17:28-30) 1st Samuel
28 Now Eliab his oldest brother heard when he spoke to the men; and Eliab’s anger burned against David and he said, “Why have you come down? And with whom have you left those few sheep in the wilderness? I know your insolence and the wickedness of your heart; for you have come down in order to see the battle.” 29 But David said, “What have I done now? Was it not just a question?” 30 Then he turned away from him to another and said the same thing; and the people answered the same thing as before.

Most think the miracle of this chapter is David’s defeat of Goliath. While this is a great miracle, let us not forget that many obstacles must be dealt with before David can even confront Goliath. The first is David’s circumstances. He is young and not even in Saul’s army. He is a shepherd boy, tending his father’s flock a number of miles away from the place where the two armies are facing off with each other. Besides Goliath, David must also get past his older brother, Eliab, and Saul. He must first obtain official permission to engage Goliath on the battlefield. The first obstacle is in the process of being removed. David is now dealing with the second obstacle – his oldest brother, Eliab – in verses 28-30.

Let us remember Eliab’s words to David here in the light of what we have already learned about him in chapter 16. Eliab is the oldest of Jesse’s eight sons; David is the youngest. Eliab must be “tall, dark, and handsome,” because Samuel expects that he will be the one he will anoint as king of Israel. Eliab is rejected (along with David’s six other older brothers) because God will not choose the king on the basis of outward appearance, but on the basis of having a heart after His own heart (13:14; 16:7). Eliab does not have the “heart” David does. Furthermore, Samuel anointed David before his brothers (16:13), so that Eliab knows about God’s selection of David as king.

By the end of chapter 17, Eliab does not come out looking very good. When he hears David inquiring of some of his fellow-soldiers about the rewards Saul has offered the man who defeats Goliath, Eliab is greatly angered and proceeds to vent that anger toward David. He first accuses David of coming to the battlefield for all the wrong reasons. Specifically, he accuses David of wanting to be a spectator at the battlefront for his own entertainment, not unlike going to a circus. Eliab either does not know that David has come in obedience to his father’s instructions, or he mentally sets this aside. He then attacks David by accusing him of forsaking his responsibilities with respect to his job of caring for his father’s sheep. He indicts David for abandoning the flock and adds insult to injury by adding the word “few” (“few sheep,” verse 28), suggesting that David’s task is not only menial (taking care of the sheep), but trivial (just a “few sheep”). In fact, David has not neglected his flock, but secured someone to care for them in his absence (verse 20). Worst of all, Eliab dares to judge his youngest brother’s heart, accusing him of acting out of a wicked heart.

Ironically, in every area Eliab accuses David, his youngest brother is not only innocent but commendable. David comes to the battlefield to bring food to his brothers and take back news to their father — he comes to the battlefield in obedience to his father’s instructions. David does not forsake his sheep; he secures someone to care for them while he is absent. David is not guilty of having a wicked heart; he is chosen by God because he is “a man after God’s own heart.” And David is not to be treated with disrespect as he will soon be Israel’s king (and this includes Eliab).

Running through all of Eliab’s accusations is one main theme: David’s youth. David is accused of coming to the battle scene out of childish curiosity. That is wrong. He is accused of forsaking his responsibilities as a child is inclined to do and also accused of insolence and wickedness of heart of which children are capable. How dare David come and raise questions pertaining to Saul’s request and Goliath’s challenge!

If David had gone home right then and given his father a complete and honest report about the war and the conduct of his older brothers, what would he have told Jesse? He would have to report that absolutely no progress had been made in defeating the Philistines, that Eliab, Abinadab, and Shammah all ran like cowards when Goliath approached. He would have to tell his father that when he brought up the subject of volunteering to fight Goliath, he was severely “cut down” by his oldest brother. Is it not interesting that Goliath’s arrogance and blasphemies are minimized by Eliab, while David is falsely accused of wickedness for doing and speaking what is right?

David may be disappointed and distressed by his oldest brother’s unkind words of condemnation, but he is not stopped by them. He answers back to his brother and challenges Eliab to be specific as to the wrong he has done by speaking as he has. He seems to insist that the matter about which he is speaking is not inappropriate. What else should one be talking about than taking on Goliath and seeking the reward Saul offers? So David continues what he has been doing – asking those around him if his understanding of Saul’s offer is correct.

PREE DIS TWIS

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Bin Laden Assassination an Occult Ritual on May Day?

Dees Illustration

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post

I openly admit that I am of the belief that coincidences are hard to come by. I might even be so bold as to suggest that they do not exist at all. It is for this reason that, when I heard that Osama bin Laden had allegedly been killed on May 1st (better known as May Day), I immediately began to wonder if there was not some kind of connection between the date and the act.

In my last article, “The Big Lie 101: Bin Laden Assassination Story Designed to Generate Fear,” I discussed the myth of bin Laden in relative detail and explained briefly how the terrorist mastermind was nothing more than a poorly crafted hoax perpetrated on the American people. This hoax has its roots in the desire to create fear and facilitate control; unfortunately, it has worked perfectly.

Regardless of public perception, the most reliable evidence available suggests that bin Laden, (if he existed at all), has been dead for close to ten years, having died shortly after 9/11, the terrorist attack that he supposedly engineered. Therefore, the claim that Osama bin Laden was killed on May 1st, 2011 is necessarily false, patently absurd, and an outright lie.

Initially, one might not see the connection between the events on May 1st and the traditional notion of May Day. After all, May Day has been promoted as the real Labor Day, a celebration of those who fought for the right to unionize and for worker’s rights such as the eight hour work day. Indeed, these are things that should be celebrated. However, the real May Day is not rooted in Labor, but in the Occult.

The Occultic version of May Day has been referred to as “the Illuminati’s second most sacred holiday.” On this day, human sacrifice is required. The ritual also involvesfire and dancing and is one of many “witches’ Sabbaths.” [These “celebrations” are often promoted as rituals to keep evil spirits away. This attracts wider participation among those who are unaware of the ritual’s true meaning.] It is said that, in the human sacrifice part of the ritual, the sacrifice must feel terror, trauma, and pain. The victim must also die from some form of conflagration.

With this in mind, the events of May 1st 2011 make a bit more sense. Regardless of the truth or falsity surrounding Osama bin Laden’s death, the PERCEPTION was that he was killed and, for the purposes of the ritual, the perception is all that is needed. It is therefore important to note that bin Laden was “killed” as an act of war (read conflagration)which, by its very nature, inflicts pain, trauma, and suffering.

When the announcement of bin Laden’s “death” was made late in the night of May 1st, (a timely revelation if one’s purpose was to produce a multitude of people outside at night) the reaction from many Americans was one of spontaneous celebration. Thousands poured out in the streets to celebrate the death/sacrifice of bin Laden with dancing and drunken revelry. The scene in Washington D.C. was telling as thousands danced under the glow of the giant phallic symbol of the Washington monument in what was possibly the biggest Occultic May Day celebration of all time.

Although it is almost certain that virtually none of the participants were capable of understanding what they were participating in (after all they believed the bin Laden fairy tale), I must confess a feeling of deep unease about what I witnessed on Sunday night. The crowds in the street could have taken off all of their clothes and painted themselves in animal blood and only seemed slightly more savage than they already did. I could not help but feel that a line had been crossed from which there may be no turning back. Yet I did not merely witness a nation’s loss of innocence (if there was any left to lose), or even a momentary loss of self-control.  I witnessed a nation who had openly embraced both devilry and decadence.

For a second, I felt as if I understood what it must have been like to be among the minority in Rome who were not entertained by watching Christians be devoured by lions, even as their neighbors rushed to the Coliseum in droves. I felt, also, that I was watching the Romans dance drunkenly in the streets, partying in blissful ignorance while the Barbarians were at the gates.

Or, perhaps a more recent comparison, I felt much like what I imagined any German citizen of conscience felt, as he watched the Nazis march down his street, his neighbors and his friends raising their arms in salute to the new leader of their nation.

The mixed emotions that I feel now are not because I was told a lie about bin Laden. It is not because a globalist elite staged a hoax and ritual on one of their most sacred nights. I feel anger, disgust, and disappointment because we, as a people, took part in it. It was not Obama, Rockefeller, or Brzezinski that danced around the Maypole Saturday night. That part was played by our own people. It was our friends and loved ones that assumed this role.

In the end, I feel as though this ritual was one of revelation. After watching the celebrations, hearing the reactions, reading the comments and Facebook posts, I feel as if this nation has been given a chance to reveal where we truly stand in terms of our own humanity. Sunday night, all of our masks were taken off and many of us were shaken to find that, underneath those masks, there were more bare skulls than we ever thought there were. Some who boast of morality and respect for human life showed their true colors on May Day and took their place in the halls of devilry. Others, believers of the official story, showed that humanity and compassion can break through anything, including a well-constructed matrix of lies.

For all the “Conservative Christians” who took part in the worship of Satan on Sunday, who are always so quick to quote Scripture in condemnation of others and in support of tyranny at home and abroad, I would leave you with a verse of Scripture which you may have neglected to read. Real or imagined, “Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth, lest the Lord see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him.” (Proverbs 24:17-18)

For all the “Left-Wing Liberals” who immediately conjure up images of the civil rights movement to justify the policy of a man who stands in direct opposition to everything that movement represented, I leave you the words of a true hero, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.” (Martin Luther King Jr.)

I stated before that there may be no turning back after what I witnessed on May 1st. In the end, I don’t believe that. I can’t allow myself to. The ritual participation that took place Sunday night took place out of ignorance and out of a belief in a carefully constructed web of lies. It has been said that those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Without a doubt, this is a true statement. Unfortunately, we have believed in absurdities for far too long and, for just as long, we have committed atrocities.

All of this can end whenever we want it to. All we have to do is stop believing in the absurdities we are being fed. As soon as we begin to think for ourselves, to understand the power that each individual possesses, and stop taking part in a system designed to control us, the system falls apart. We are all that holds it together and, soon as realize this, it can no longer keep us in bondage.

In the end, we must remember that Infinite love is the only truth. Everything else is illusion.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University where he earned the Pee Dee Electric Scholar’s Award as an undergraduate. He has had numerous articles published dealing with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, and civil liberties. He also the author of Codex Alimentarius – The End of Health Freedom and 7 Real Conspiracies.

 

MURDAH!!! KITCHENER SED IT>>

PRE THE LYRICS…JAMAICAN WOMAN ALWAYS KNOWN FI DEFEND DEM MONEY FUSSSSSSS HISTRIE!

JMG CULTURE–SAUDERING!

DISCLAIMER The views or opinions appearing on this blog are solely those of their respective authors. In no way do such posts represent the views, opinions or beliefs of “Met,” or jamaicangroupiemet.com. “Met” and jamaicangroupiemet.com will not assume liability for the opinions or statements, nor the accuracy of such statements, posted by users utilizing this blog to express themselves. Users are advised that false statements which are defamatory in nature may be subject to legal action, for which the user posting such statements will be personally liable for any damages or other liability, of any nature, arising out of the posting of such statements. Comments submitted to this blog may be edited to meet our format and space requirements. We also reserve the right to edit vulgar language and/or comments involving topics we may deem inappropriate for this web site.

****RULES**** 1. Debates and rebuttals are allowed but disrespectful curse-outs will prompt immediate BAN 2. Children are never to be discussed in a negative way 3. Personal information  eg. workplace, status, home address are never to be posted in comments. 4. All are welcome but please exercise discretion when posting your comments , do not say anything about someone you wouldnt like to be said about  you. 5. Do not deliberately LIE on someone here or send in any information based on your own personal vendetta. 6. If your picture was taken from a prio site eg. fimiyaad etc and posted on JMG, you cannot request its removal. 7. If you dont like this forum, please do not whine and wear us out, do yourself the favor of closing the screen- Thanks! . To send in a story send your email to :- [email protected]